A shocking story is emerging from Bangladesh and India. It is being speculated that a military coup could take place at any moment in Bangladesh.
Now, it becomes clear that there is a significant difference between reel life and reality. Time is running out, and Yunus is at the end of his road because the "D
ual Doctrine" has been activated. However, some critical questions need to be answered by India.
- Will India implement a plan regarding the 2 to 2.5 crore Rohingya Bangladeshis residing illegally?
- Will the Arakan Army capture the Naf River properly to destroy Rohingya refugee camps?
For a long time, the U.S. had supported Bangladesh, but now, as financial aid has ended, chaos is erupting everywhere. The speculative fake system that was set up will not last. Listen carefully to the full story to connect all the dots.
A month ago, Firstpost raised the question: "Is trouble brewing in the Bangladesh Army?" The Bangladesh military is reportedly moving in a radical direction, just as the country itself has. Foreign agencies, including Pakistan and the U.S., wanted radical elements to take over leadership positions in intelligence, the military, and artillery. The goal was to use these radical leaders to destabilize India, just as Pakistan has done in Kashmir and Punjab.
Even India’s state-run DD News has reported on the possibility of a military coup in Bangladesh. Historically, Bangladesh has had a pattern of humiliating leaders, bringing them into power, then removing them through military coups—similar to Pakistan’s history. India had hoped that Bangladesh would develop into a democracy after celebrating its independence anniversary with India, but the reality is different.
The democratic model in Bangladesh has turned into something else. Sheikh Hasina is being branded as India's enemy and a dictator over the Bangladeshi people. Meanwhile, her government's own supporters are toppling statues of Bangladesh’s founding father. Is radicalization playing a role here? This isn't just political persecution.
Sheikh Hasina was only given 45 minutes, showing that she was just a neighbor to India, not a sisterly figure. In Bangladesh, some even claim she is a RAW agent—if true, it would mean she has significantly helped India. However, radicals are now being used to target members of the ruling Awami League. Women associated with the Awami League have been victims of violence, and horrific crimes are taking place, but the UN remains silent.
The Western narrative tells a different story, portraying student protests as a fight for democracy. But in reality, deeper forces are at play. The devil lies in the details. There are comparisons between Yunus and Zelensky. Just as Trump dismissed Zelensky's demands, will Yunus face the same fate?
The U.S. has not gained what it wanted from Bangladesh—particularly a military base on St. Martin's Island. Sheikh Hasina refused to provide it, which may have influenced America's shifting stance. Yunus had globalist backing, particularly from the Democratic Party, including the Clintons, Obamas, and Kamala Harris.
Trump has hinted at financial manipulations and said that intelligence agencies allow him to speak only so much. The real financial deals likely involve billions, not just millions, as America aimed to remove both Modi in India and Sheikh Hasina in Bangladesh. While they succeeded in removing Hasina, Modi remains strong despite foreign interference in India's elections.
Now, radical organizations like Hefazat-e-Islam are pressuring Yunus, though he regularly met with their leaders—suggesting he mainstreamed radical elements himself. Leaders like Jasim Uddin Rahmani have even called for severing India’s Northeast from the rest of the country and merging it with Bangladesh as part of their dream of "Greater Bangladesh."
Central intelligence agencies, including military intelligence and RAW, have been monitoring developments. Groups like Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) and Ansar-ul-Bangla are key players, while student protests serve as mere fronts to gain U.S. sympathy. The reality is that radical groups are seizing power through violence and intimidation.
This is not just about Bangladesh—there are larger geopolitical moves at play. The strategy includes setting up camps near India's Northeast, using them for training, and pushing insurgencies into the region. Pakistan's ISI is reportedly involved in Rangpur, a region near India’s strategic "Chicken's Neck" corridor, with broader implications for India’s security.
Here is the English translation of the text:
The need is there, but the most important thing is to look at this—the entire military coup's game plan was not kept in Bangladesh or India, not in America, but in Pakistan. This is because there are some power-hungry military generals in the Bangladeshi military who want to come into power and take Bangladesh in a radical direction. These people are not thinking about Bangladesh; they are thinking about their ideology.
Such individuals were repeatedly called to and from Pakistan by ISI, which was essentially engaging in arms dealing with them through Chittagong and Cox’s Bazar. They were provided arms, training camps were set up, Rohingyas were armed, and rebels were trained in the Sylhet Valley for Northeast India. This is why discussions were taking place about bringing those with ISI connections into power.
A month ago, a clear article was written—not naturally, but rather, it was arranged to be written. Somewhere, an intelligence agency must have had some input, which was then fed to a journalist, who then connected the dots to create a story.
That’s why the article from Firstpost, "Does the Bangladesh Army Chief Face a Coup from Pro-Islamist Factions?"—the answer is yes. Major General Fazlur Rahman, the Director General of Foreign Intelligence, has strong connections with ISI. He has a strong affinity for Jinnah, Pakistan, and ISI, and he seeks to seize power by any means necessary.
However, the key point here is that he does not have soldiers under him. Yet, it is being said that he, along with two or three generals, is working as a team and engaging in discussions with soldiers to create divisions within the Bangladeshi military. The idea is to overthrow Waker-Uz-Zaman just as Sheikh Hasina was removed.
Do you know the reason? Because Sheikh Hasina’s appointees, those who voted for her, those who were connected to the Awami League in any way—including businessmen—must be victimized and hit. As a result of this, the radical elements nurtured and fed for so long, released from prison, have now become uncontrollable.
It's a simple fact—if you nurture a snake, it will bite you. After the Bangladesh Air Force base attack, it was denied, but articles still mention that "one person was killed." Have you ever heard of an attack on an air force base where only one person was killed? Is that even possible?
The model for this is Pakistan. In Pakistan, attacks happen on military bases because they nurture these very snakes. The same is happening in Bangladesh. The same radical elements used for attacks like Uri in India are now being fostered in Bangladesh.
The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has to be understood in the domestic context. A BNP leader was beaten to death in front of his wife. The Hindu newspaper covered it because he was a BNP leader, but had he been an ordinary Hindu, there would have been no coverage in The Hindu or The Indian Express.
How many temples were destroyed? How many Hindus were hunted down? How many teachers were forced to resign and humiliated in schools and bureaucracy? Judges were beaten inside the court premises in Bangladesh—this is the reality.
So who controls law and order? Is it in the hands of Yunus? The student protesters? Jamaat? JMB? Ansarullah Bangla Team? No one controls it. It is complete anarchy and mob rule—whoever wants to kill someone, kills them.
Crime rates in Bangladesh are spiking, but the government remains in denial. How will businesses function? What kind of economic reforms was Yunus talking about? Is crime the reform? Killing minorities, Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, attacking their faith, their temples—are these the reforms?
Even BNP now says something is wrong. General Mirza Islam Alamgir asks Yunus to stay neutral, hold elections quickly, and carry out reforms, or else they cannot wait until December.
The pressure is immense—Jaishankar has clearly said, "Choose what you want." Even Trump says, "Prime Minister Modi will handle Bangladesh." Funding has been cut. Elon Musk is reluctant to give money. Mohammed Nas is desperately calling for Starlink to be deployed in Bangladesh. Every Bangladeshi news outlet now talks about Elon Musk providing the internet.
But survival is difficult. Yunus is running out of money and supporters. Even the so-called student protesters supporting him will soon abandon him and form their own political parties. But forming a political party and winning elections are two different things.
Now think—what if BNP gets India’s support by mistake? Or even worse, what if BNP and Awami League reach an understanding? What will happen then to radical student leaders? That’s why BNP student leaders are now attacking student protesters. 150 students were beaten up in an engineering college.
The leader of the July uprising in Bangladesh has quit the U.S. cabinet to take a position in a new student party. So, who will Yunus govern if all these student leaders form their own parties?
BNP wants elections. Awami League wants to return. The Army Chief says, "I have had enough." So, who will control Bangladesh? Everyone is acting in their own interest. Even America, which brought Yunus to power and funded him, is now helpless. That’s why he is literally crying for help.
Yunus is asking Musk to come and launch Starlink in 90 days. But the reality is, he does not have 90 days—maybe only 9 or 18.
The United Nations is being mobilized, but even Israel has warned them to stay out of it. Biden may be gone, but his influence remains. However, funding has already been cut by Elon Musk and Donald Trump. The UN is incapable of doing anything—they can’t stop Christians from being killed in Congo or Hindus from being killed in Bangladesh.
Yet, they are here to support Yunus. The UN wants to mobilize the international community to help Bangladesh on the Rohingya issue, but India should make it clear to Gutierrez (UN Secretary-General) that he should not cross the red line.
That is the situation—this is all about power, money, and influence.
Comments
Post a Comment